Blogs

Tottenham Hotspur’s Jewish Supporters & Why Baddiel Is Wrong

|
Image for Tottenham Hotspur’s Jewish Supporters & Why Baddiel Is Wrong

Never quite got into the whole guest blogger thing.

Did it few times and despite being convinced I wasn’t precious about this game it proved I was…. however… What follows is a cracking piece from Robert Samuelson who is a soon to be lawyer and a writer of words well worth reading.

May I apologise to regular readers who weren’t expecting decent content and assure them normal service will be resumed asap… Sammy’s Blog which you need to bookmark, by the way is HERE.

Apparently I’m being racially abused. Yes, it’s true. Ask David Baddiel. He’s Jewish and he likes football so he should know. Don’t worry about asking any other Jewish football fans; just adopt the default setting of the persecuted outcast and complain. It’s the only way to make the bigots see sense on the terraces of White Hart Lane and beyond.

Or is it? David Baddiel is a smart man. He went to Haberdashers’. So it was with some surprise that I discovered he is fronting a new campaign to raise awareness of anti-Semitism in football. Of-course, there is absolutely nothing wrong with conducting a public exercise in informing people of the problems of racism. Such a display of philanthropic morality is to be applauded. In modern day Britain we live in a world of both vocal and silent oppression.

The days of Brick Lane riots may be long gone, but the sinister guise of homophobia, xenophobia, hatred and idiocy still lurks on our street corners and estates, in our places of work and, sadly, through the dogma of some extremist political parties. In many ways David Baddiel is being perfectly avant-garde in his decision to lend voice to thought and publicity to propriety.

Unfortunately this is the right campaign carried out in the wrong way; the correct sentiment utterly confused with incorrect methodology. Anti-semitism exists in football; this much is true. We’ve all heard opposition fans hissing in evil reproduction of the noise of gas chambers. Some of us may have even been subjected to direct chants of real racial venom, songs and phrases that go way beyond what can be publically understood as ‘banter’ and well across the line into blatant abuse.

A campaign to raise awareness of such incidences is important. It brings the problem to the forefront of national debate, concentrating the minds of our policing and political authorities towards tackling the problem, and hopefully encouraging the silent majority to stand up and shout down the racially prejudiced. Baddiel’s campaign would be fine if that appeared to be its overriding objective and, for all I know, perhaps it is. Perhaps the ultimate aim is to achieve just that: a new wave of citizens fighting back against the appalling behaviour of a small minority of extremists. If that is the case, then I applaud and lend my support to a scheme that, if it was intending such an end, is as nuanced as it is principled.

Sadly I am afraid Baddiel has completely missed the point. It is startling that so much of the dialogue that this campaign has created has been about the use of the word ‘yid’ at places like Tottenham Hotspur FC.

On its own, or out of the context of a football match at White Hart Lane or another Spurs-related event elsewhere, this word would undoubtedly cause offence. It is steeped in a history of persecution, arising etymologically from Eastern European ‘Yiddish’ language, which mixed German, Polish and Russian with Hebrew into a vernacular of specific peculiarity to Ashkenazi Judaism. The Nazis would abbreviate Yiddish speakers to ‘Yids’.

It became a by-word for segregation, for misinterpretation, for the ghetto, the concentration camps. Even earlier than Hitler, the term ‘Yid’ had been used to separate Jews from locals in Russian villages during the Pogroms of the late nineteenth century. Go back through annals of Jewish history, and the word ‘Yid’ has been used not so much by Jews themselves, but by those who have sought to isolate them, to control them, to destroy them.

Imagine the following scenario: a businessman is chairing a meeting and introducing each participant. Round the table he goes, using first names, last names, nicknames, informally and affably combining the professional with the casual as he takes control of the session ahead. Reaching a Jewish man at the table, the chairman describes him as a ‘yid’. Is this socially unacceptable, humiliating, degrading, inappropriate and offensive? Yes, absolutely.

Now imagine the next scenario: it is 1973 and English football is rife with racism, dominated by white masters in boardrooms and white supremacists in the stands. Tottenham Hotspur are playing a home game and the visiting supporters start singing a song about Auschwitz. Knowing that Spurs have more Jewish supporters than any other team (although Arsenal are a very close second), these visiting supporters immediately latch on to the fact that, somewhere near them in the stadium, will be a Jew. Is the song as equally disgusting and illegal as the businessman in the scenario above? Yes, absolutely.

If Baddiel was trying to fight against instances akin to those described above, we’d be discussing a campaign of genuine altruism. Racism of any form should not be tolerated anywhere, but in the UK in 2011 it is a downright disgrace that its menace still stalks our streets.

We live in the age of information, where knowledge is but a click, a touch screen, away. With the dissemination of ideas and opinions comes an opportunity to educate. This should be a time of ever-increasing harmony, not through a new closeness in our coalition politics, but simply out of pure understanding of each other, of why and how we are they way we are.

I feel proud to live in a free country like the UK, where any and all religions are tolerated, where our right to protest is celebrated and encouraged, where our troops fight for similar freedoms around the world, where we can be as bright a beacon of hope for humanity as the great revolutionaries that have gone before in America, in France and, yes, in England in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries.

Yet still our progress is hampered by a moronic few, the sub-intelligent detriments to development. We can all see how the British National Party feeds on basic social fears and political vacuums, feeding worried communities with propaganda and vitriol, anger and resentment. Violence begets violence, misunderstanding begets misunderstanding. Across generations such sentiment breeds and festers, a cancerous molecule redoubling with every passing year in isolated localities under siege from extremists. Their racism needs documenting. Our freedom depends on it.

You do not need to be Jewish, or a football fan, to know that the two illustrations I set out above are not, or were not, beyond the realms of possibility. In the 1970s, anti-semitism really was rife, not just in football but throughout society. Football, with its already laddish culture of booze and banter, was an easy breeding ground for such acerbic extremist behaviour. Tottenham supporters were easy targets and something had to be done.

In the way that only football fans can, supporters of Spurs turned the anti-Semitic chants and songs on to the racists themselves. It was, and is, a display of sheer genius from the terraces of N17; reserve psychology so impressive that for forty years or so Tottenham Hotspur has imbued a sense of defiance in the face of anti-Semites, taking on the label of ‘yids’ not as a crest of abuse but a badge of honour. Racists cannot sing songs about ‘yids’ if the Jews themselves are referring to their team and their fellow fans as ‘yiddos’.

David Baddiel should understand context and shame on him for miscomprehending it or, worse still, ignoring it. Tottenham Hotspur supporters define themselves as the ‘yid army’ to shut the racists up. While it is no doubt true that some Spurs fans themselves will be idiotic bigots and unaware of why we do this, the vast majority know that this is a club that has spent many years fighting against oppressive supremacists.

It might have started as gallows humour or simply psychosomatic mockery and repartee between rival sets of supporters, but Tottenham’s identification with Jewish terminology and paraphernalia was borne out of a sense of injustice and of needing to find a way to stop the hatred.

The real racists are the ones hissing about gas chambers, or mocking those in turbans, or beating up black people. They are not 36,000 Spurs fans lifting blue-and-white Israeli flags with ‘THFC’ on them, or telling Jermain Defoe he is a ‘yiddo’ because he plays for their beloved team. It may not be to everyone’s taste, but it helps create a community, a history, a togetherness.

The irony is that such features, if adopted throughout mainstream society, would help lock the door on racists forever. Bigotry breeds during moments of uncertainty and fear, when the walls of society start to break down, when cracks appear in our socio-economic cohesion. David Cameron may not be explaining ‘the Big Society’ very well, but the underlying motif is right: only through creating a real sense of community on our streets will we be able to treat each other with the understanding, respect and freedom that we all deserve.

Let me be clear. On its own, out of context and away from the stadium, calling someone a ‘yid’ is insulting and offensive. Spurs fans refer to each other by the use of this term not to offend others, but out of a sense of uniqueness through togetherness. It is a complex concept, merging together a small religion’s sense of persecution into a large societal movement, acknowledging our isolation by letting a larger association take on our struggle with us.

This is not about shouting the word ‘yid’ randomly on the street. It is about understanding why Spurs fans use the term, where it comes from and what it means. When you go to the trouble of learning the situation’s nuance, intricacy and history it puts the onus back on David Baddiel to refocus his efforts more appropriately to the situation.

On Wednesday 20 April 2011, Spurs will play Arsenal at White Hart Lane: the North London Derby between the two sides in England with the most Jewish supporters. Baddiel’s video will be shown on the big screens. His virtuous ambition should be applauded. Sadly for all concerned, the strategy and logic to achieve such lofty and respected aims is simplistic.

Important issues deserve intelligent solutions, not lowest-common-denominator philosophy. Jewish football fans deserve better than that; after all, we’ve been fighting this battle for decades. Without David Baddiel, and in our own peculiar way, we seem to be getting somewhere.

Gareth Bale will still be a ‘yiddo’ when he runs over towards the Shelf Side to take a corner.

Spurs will still be the ‘yid army’, not just as a battle cry to fight the opposition on the pitch, but to take on the racists at their own game in the stands.

Share this article

102 comments

  • liamyid says:

    Baddiel is an idiot. Getting on his high horse because he needs some attention. His career peaked in 96 and he’s depressed about it. He said on twitter, Spurs fans have about as much right to call themselves yids as I do ‘n****r’! What a massive c*nt! We have taken the word away from the racist to use as an insult and adopted it. Search the n****r on google, your get 1mil pages on racism. Search Yid, get 1mil spurs sites!

  • Cyril says:

    Should have added the key point to my post above: they started it!!

    As any Spurs supporter knows, BUT BADDIEL IGNORES, we only adopted the word in response to abuse from fans of other clubs, mainly his. From his account, they haven’t got much better (no great surprise really). That is where the campaign should focus.

    Spurs fans must be among the least anti-Semitic in the game.

  • The Boys says:

    I sadly think you have missed the point. Many spurs fans do not, or did not until now that “yid” IS a derogatory term. They write the word on social networking sites, twitter. A friend told me that an Arsenal youth team player tweeted that “the yids” had lost and it was not until he was informed that this is and always has been vile way of describing tottenham and its supporters. Thankfully we have moved on and (most) teams do there best to stop this kind of chanting and it now happens a lot less then some years ago. Therefore the argument that we have reclaimed the word no longer works, because society has moved one and only true scumbags use these terms. Many spurs fans have just been educated on what the word Yid means and that is good, not bad. Remember this when you walk into a train and talk about spurs as the yids, the person sitting opposite or nearby could well take offense and IT IS ILLEGAL.

    • Acton_Yid says:

      >” that this is and always has been a vile way of describing tottenham and its supporters”

      Er, no mate. I don’t see where this “vile” context comes from, you just made that up. Look, I use the word “Yid” to describe my screen nickname, does that make me a “vile” person ? You don’t even know me in RL so how could it. Yes, I *might* be vile in RL, theres always that possibility, but to suppose that someone is on the whim of a context of a word is clearly idiotic.

      • The Boys says:

        correct. people who don’t know you will not know how to take your use the word yid because they don’t know you. A gooner friend of mine told me that on European trips there are a handful of goons that sing “the yids the yids we got to get rid of the yids” are they talking about spurs or do they actually mean jews. We have (and do)own it in a positive way but we need to realise football has thankfully moved on and when people use the term walking up to the lane shouting YIDS YIDS YIDS, this WILL offend some people, even if the intent is not there. I am not a lefty pc person and with my friends I use all sorts of language that I would not use in public for the very reason you have stated. Basically I am aware that it could cause offense, even though I don’t have a racist bone in my body (i know it and all my friends know it), for that reason I don’t use language like that in public because racist/anti semitic offense is the last thing i would want impose on someone, even un intentionally.

    • Rebrov says:

      What a plonker

    • Rebrov says:

      If you aren’t a lefty you should be. Looking for offense when there isn’t any. You are the sort that wants Christmas to be called winterval for fear of some imagined slight on people of other religion. Get a life

  • Van der faart says:

    I understand the reverse psychology in the use of Yid Army, and the pride in which we express it in our tribe of supporters, however is this argument still appropriate if a different ethnic minority group had settled and concentrated in N17? …if the chants were ‘p*** army’ or ‘n***** army’ then it would seem much less appropriate to use it as our anthem and calls to stop it would be well justified!

    • Wes says:

      “…if the chants were ‘p*** army’ or ‘n***** army’ then it would seem much less appropriate to use it as our anthem and calls to stop it would be well justified!”

      it would only seem less appropriate as it isn’t what we do now. if we’d been shouting p*** army or N***** army for 30 years in an effort to reclaim the word as we’ve done with the word Yid, , absurd as it sounds, it would be tolerated. I’m black and yes, initially the thought of 30,000 fellow fans shouting N***** army sounds abhorrent but after serious reflection on this issue and trying to empathise with Jews when they hear the word at WHL, I actually find myself feeling envious. I sincerely wish my fellow fans had reclaimed the word Nigger, as it just wouldn’t have had the effect it has on me, in my life, when used as an Insult directed at me.

  • bob says:

    its seems ………farcical to give the impression that spurs fans are being racist by singing yid army etc showing unity with the jewish heritage ,history and area of the club?? making……further to label chants racist etc out of context is denial of language of the positives….and shows how stupid and self opinionated celebrities without real philosophical understanding get it….wrong .with a simple arguement..think again Mr Baddiel…….leave chelsea and join the yid army….you might find yourself singing along!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *