Good morning.
It was made pretty bleedin’ obvious to me that there is a place for Tottingham fans like me when it comes to competitions like this. Behind glass in a museum. But in the interests of getting on with it here’s the rating based upon the shifts put in and not the idiotic strategy applied to the tournament.
One or two good moments when called upon.
Like his spirit. Needs to watch his temper.
Don’t cha wish your right back was A&E?
Needs to be loaned out. See a bit of the world.
Stellar goal, but is he a bit thick?
Not match fit, last night will have blown a few cobwebs away.
Says he’s happy. I say they’ve just upped his Prozac.
Jenas on acid.
He’s waiting to leave. Which is a pity.
His unrelenting determination paid off. Again.
Why is he thick! Your a knob HH
I tell you what Pablo, you ask me nicely and I’ll tell you.
A great example of a common grammatical trap, “your” as in it is yours, “you’re” as in you are.
http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/274894-gray.html#document/p1
What about A&E?
Very sporting of us to only play with 9 men, and we still won 4 zip…….
How do you judge players against such low-quality oppo? Krankie looked awesome but they gave him so much time on the ball. By contrast Defoe looked poor against the same players. Townsend did really well and showed great confidence in taking men on time and again. Pienaar played his best game for us so far which isn’t saying much, but let’s hope this is just the beginning for him. Dos santos looks world class for Mexico but always disappoints for us.